What Happens When DCPP / DYFS Calls You

Kid and Adult Shadow New Jersey's Division of Child Protection and Permanency (DCPP) is the state agency responsible to investigate allegations of child abuse or neglect. Formerly called the Division of Youth and Family Services (DYFS) until 2012, the agency's stated mission is to ensure the safety, permanency and well-being of children and to support families. However, receiving a phone call from DCPP/DYFS can immediately create anxiety that a child may be taken from the home. Understanding how the division operates may ease that stress.

By law, anyone suspecting child abuse or neglect must report the suspicion. Reports are typically made by neighbors, medical personnel, school and church officials as well as parents.

Abuse includes causing head or internal injuries, burns, wounds, bone fractures, cuts, bruises and sprains to a child or allowing circumstances to exist which caused such injuries. Sexually abusing a child, allowing a child to be sexually abused and willful abandonment also constitute abuse.

Neglect may result from failing to provide adequate supervision, food, clothing, education or medical care. Because of such broad definitions, it is conceivable that even a relatively harmless act could be used to allege abuse or neglect. Further, while one act may not constitute abuse or neglect by itself, the Division will often attempt to justify its action by relying on the totality of a series of events.

The Investigation

Once DCPP receives notice of suspected abuse, the agency is required by law to investigate. Within 24 hours of receiving a report, an intake worker will meet with the child and family in their home to observe conditions, assess the safety of the child and investigate concerns raised by the report.

Children and parents will typically be interviewed separately. The initial meeting may involve taking pictures or video. The intake worker must follow-up with school or medical personnel if they were the source of the report. The worker is also required to interview witnesses and others who may have knowledge of the alleged circumstances.

Investigations are to be completed within 60 days. When examination of the circumstances suggests the report was completely unfounded or that the allegation, even if true, would not constitute abuse or neglect, an investigation may conclude within 30 days, but that is a rare exception. Generally, if there is any supporting evidence of the allegation, the agency will use the full 60 days to examine the claim.

If the intake worker on a first visit believes there is actual harm to the child or an imminent risk of harm, the worker may immediately remove the child from the home without first obtaining a court order. If the worker believes there is a substantial but not imminent risk of harm, the agency must first seek a court order before removing a child. Alternatively, the agency may find the potential for harm has lessened and allow the child to remain in the home.

The Division is required to make reasonable efforts to avoid removing a child from his or her home and family. If a risk of harm may be ongoing, implementation of a protection plan can be required as a condition for keeping the child at home. For example, if one parent has allegedly been abusive toward the child, the protection plan could allow the child to remain at home with the non-abusive parent. The plan would include provisions for actions to be taken if the other parent attempts to return home or contact the child.

Contesting Action by DCPP

If DCPP/DYFS removes a child from the home without first obtaining a court order, the Division must file a Complaint in court within two days. If the child is not removed from home, the state may still file a Complaint seeking to remove a child, restrict parental access or require the parents and child to engage in counseling and other services. The two-day deadline does not apply when the child remains at home. An attorney will be assigned to represent the child. Parents unable to afford private counsel will also be assigned an attorney.

After the Complaint is filed, a court hearing will be set requiring the parents or guardian of the child to "show cause" why approval should not be granted for action the Division has either taken or is requesting to take. A parent contesting the Division's action must be prepared to aggressively challenge the state's allegations.

If a child has been removed from the home by DCPP without a court order, a parent is entitled to have a court hearing within three court days. The law states that a court must order return of the child unless the return presents an imminent risk to the child's life, safety or health. To prevail, the parent must show that the home environment presents no such risk.

If the court does not order return of the child to the primary care of a parent at these initial hearings, the Division must ask the parent for the names of family members and friends with whom the child could live until the case is resolved. The non-accused parent will generally receive priority if able and willing to care for the child.

When the initial investigation is not favorably concluded within 60 days, extended litigation often ensues. A full fact-finding hearing must take place within four to six months. Ultimate disposition can range from leaving a child in the home and providing support services to the family to termination of parental rights and allowing adoption of the child.

This sequence of events represents the tip of the iceberg when the Division becomes involved with a family. If the Division comes calling, one of your first steps should be consultation with an attorney experienced with these types of cases. If you have a DCPP/DYFS issue, call the Law Offices of Peter Van Aulen, at 201-845-7400 for a free consultation.

Client Reviews
★★★★★
Peter has integrity, and values his relationships with his clients beyond his financial relationship with them. For me to say this about any lawyer is really saying something. He is compassionate, straightforward and knowledgeable. I would easily recommend him to anybody. Lewie W.
★★★★★
Peter Van Aulen handled my case with great diligence and integrity. He is also a compassionate individual who realizes what a difficult time divorce can be emotionally. Peter works hard and doesn't take any shortcuts in preparing for a case… I highly recommend Mr. Van Aulen and his staff. Chuck Solomon
★★★★★
Peter is an exceptionally great attorney. He handled my child custody case and was able to ease any of my concerns with honest answers. He always took the time to explain the pros/cons and was always available to answer any questions that I had… I would highly recommend this attorney to anyone who is looking for one. Jessica Cruz
★★★★★
Peter Van Aulen is a very compassionate, honest and straightforward person. He was there for me at my lowest point with a genuine concern not only for my situation, but for me and my child's well being above all… He is fair and he is strong and when push comes to shove he is there for you. Cathy Dodge
★★★★★
Our cousin used Peter's law office to help with a sticky custody situation. He was extremely responsive, very nice and most importantly did an awesome job with the court! He is awesome. Lawrence Polsky

*Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances