Alimony in NJ and the Savings Component

Lombardi v. Lombardi

The recent case of Lombardi v. Lombardi deals with a wealthy couple’s divorce, specifically the payment of alimony. This case is unique because the couple spent their marriage saving the vast majority of their sizeable income, and prudently saving the rest.

The Lombardi’s divorced after 20 years of marriage and three children. Mr. Lombardi brought in a sizeable income in the financial sector while Mrs. Lombardi left a high paying job when her first child was born. The Lombardi’s savings averaged a sizeable $67,000 per month, and despite average earnings in excess of $1 million, the couple lived modestly in favor of saving over spending.

When they divorced, Mrs. Lombardi received alimony to cover her monthly expenses, but did not receive a savings component to the alimony. The divorce settlement also awarded her a large sum of money and she continued to live in the marital home, which was owned outright at the time the final judgment of divorce was entered.

Established New Jersey Law - Savings Included in Alimony To Protect Supported Spouse

Established New Jersey law says that an accumulation of “reasonable savings” should be included in alimony, in order to protect the supported spouse against the loss of alimony. The court wants the supported spouse to be protected in the event that the alimony ends or is reduced at some point in the future. In this case, Mrs. Lombardi requested a savings component to the alimony award, in addition to covering her living expenses. However, the trial court found that since Mrs. Lombardi’s alimony was not at risk due to her sizeable divorce judgment, a savings component should not be added to the alimony order.

The question presented to the court in the Lombardi appeal was whether the parties' history of regular savings as part of their marital lifestyle required including savings as a component of alimony, even when the need to protect the supported spouse does not exist.

The Goal of Alimony in New Jersey

The goal of alimony is to assist the supported spouse in achieving a lifestyle reasonably comparable to the one enjoyed during the marriage. Certainly the Lombardi’s history of savings was clearly shown through the evidence presented at the trial, including expert testimony from a forensic accountant. The court found that their savings was a part of their lifestyle during the marriage.

The Holding of Lombardi and Alimony in NJ

The court concluded that it must consider evidence of regular savings by the parties during the marriage in determining an alimony award, even if there is no concern of protecting a future alimony award.

Peter Van Aulen has over 24 years of experience in divorce and family law. He is certified by the New Jersey Supreme Court as a Matrimonial Attorney. This is an honor given to a small number of attorneys in New Jersey. For any questions you might have regarding divorce or the payment of alimony in NJ, please call the Law Offices of Peter Van Aulen at (201) 845-7400 for a free consultation.

Source

Lombardi v. Lombardi, No. A-3624-13T1

Reviews
★★★★★
Peter has integrity, and values his relationships with his clients beyond his financial relationship with them. For me to say this about any lawyer is really saying something. He is compassionate, straightforward and knowledgeable. I would easily recommend him to anybody.
★★★★★
Peter Van Aulen handled my case with great diligence and integrity. He is also a compassionate individual who realizes what a difficult time divorce can be emotionally. Peter works hard and doesn't take any shortcuts in preparing for a case… I highly recommend Mr. Van Aulen and his staff. Chuck Solomon
★★★★★
Peter is an exceptionally great attorney. He handled my child custody case and was able to ease any of my concerns with honest answers. He always took the time to explain the pros/cons and was always available to answer any questions that I had… I would highly recommend this attorney to anyone who is looking for one. Jessica Cruz
★★★★★
Peter Van Aulen is a very compassionate, honest and straightforward person. He was there for me at my lowest point with a genuine concern not only for my situation, but for me and my child's well being above all… He is fair and he is strong and when push comes to shove he is there for you. Cathy Dodge
★★★★★
Our cousin used Peter's law office to help with a sticky custody situation. He was extremely responsive, very nice and most importantly did an awesome job with the court! He is awesome. Lawrence Polsky

*Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances