Property Division and Divorce - Homes, Retirement and Businesses

Couple with a Cardboard House Whether states divide property based on the principle of equitable distribution or community property law, general guidelines are similar. Property acquired prior to marriage or after a specific date of separation is generally classified as a person's separate property. Assets acquired during the marriage, with a few exceptions, are considered community or marital property. Both property distribution schemes generally favor each spouse keeping his or her separate property. Community property states attempt to distribute marital assets equally while equitable distribution states strive for distributing those assets fairly but not necessarily equally.

Dividing much of the property when a marriage fails can be fairly straightforward. It is a relatively simple task to allocate kitchen appliances, books, linen, clothing and other personal effects. Difficulties arise when dealing with big ticket items such as the family home, businesses, and retirement accounts.

The Family Home

If the home was purchased after the marriage using funds from both spouses, the home will be considered community/marital property. The current value can be estimated by subtracting the outstanding mortgage amount from the estimated current selling price. Theoretically, each spouse would be entitled to half of the resulting amount. 

If the house was owned by spouse A prior to marriage, the value of the home at the time of marriage must be compared to the current fair market value. The difference in values will likely be deemed community/marital property if spouse B contributed in any way to the increased value through expending personal effort or funds for improvements. 

As for the long term, each spouse must consider if it's financially feasible for one of them to keep the home and make the mortgage payments. If one spouse plans to keep the residence, that person will need to buyout the other spouse's financial interest in the home. This may be accomplished by substituting other assets acceptable to the vacating spouse. Alternatively, the homeowner may give the spouse an interest-bearing lien against the property to be paid when the home sells. Provisions in the divorce decree can be added to require sale by a certain date or following an event such as the graduation of the youngest child from high school.

A sounder financial decision may result in selling the home immediately, dividing the proceeds and finding new residences. Selling requires cooperation between the spouses to set a price, choose a realtor, prepare the property and manage offers. When spouses are unable to work together, the court may set general guidelines for the sale and give one party the primary authority to sell the home.

Businesses

The value of a business or professional practice started after marriage will most likely be considered community/marital property even if the business is owned and primarily operated by one spouse. If the business was started before marriage, any increased value occurring after the marriage began is often classified as marital property in New Jersey if the non-owner spouse contributed to the business's growth in some way. Obtaining an independent appraisal of the business is usually advised rather than relying on an accountant who handles the business bookkeeping or other financial affairs. Once the financial interest of each spouse is determined, the business could be sold and the proceeds split or the business owner will need to buyout the other spouse's interest.

Retirement Accounts

It is not uncommon when both spouses have retirement benefits to simply agree that each spouse will keep his or her own benefits regardless of value. Otherwise, the value of retirement accounts must be determined. Any increase since the date of marriage will usually be considered community/marital property.

If a party is awarded a portion of their spouse's plan, such as a 401(k) account, he or she needs to rollover their distribution from their spouses 401(k) into his or her own retirement account to avoid incurring any tax penalty. Futher, some retirement plans require the retirement plan to be divided by a Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO).

If a Spouse's retirement is a defined benefit plan (pension), an expert may be required to determine the value. Once value is established, Spouse B may choose to retain all rights to the account and buyout spouse A's share with other assets. Alternatively, one spouse may grant the other spouse an interest in the retirement account, but distribution of benefits would be deferred until they become payable in the future. Deferred payment requires a Qualified Domestic Relations QDRO to be signed by the court and provided to the retirement plan administrator. A lawyer or the plan administrator should be consulted to ensure the order is properly drafted.

Divorcing couples should always strive to reach agreement on property division. Courts usually approve agreed proposals. When spouses cannot agree, a judge must decide, and the decision may be unpopular with both parties. If you have any questions concerning property and divorce in New Jersey, call the Law Offices of Peter Van Aulen at 201-845-7400 for a free in office initial consultation.

Client Reviews
★★★★★
Peter has integrity, and values his relationships with his clients beyond his financial relationship with them. For me to say this about any lawyer is really saying something. He is compassionate, straightforward and knowledgeable. I would easily recommend him to anybody. Lewie W.
★★★★★
Peter Van Aulen handled my case with great diligence and integrity. He is also a compassionate individual who realizes what a difficult time divorce can be emotionally. Peter works hard and doesn't take any shortcuts in preparing for a case… I highly recommend Mr. Van Aulen and his staff. Chuck Solomon
★★★★★
Peter is an exceptionally great attorney. He handled my child custody case and was able to ease any of my concerns with honest answers. He always took the time to explain the pros/cons and was always available to answer any questions that I had… I would highly recommend this attorney to anyone who is looking for one. Jessica Cruz
★★★★★
Peter Van Aulen is a very compassionate, honest and straightforward person. He was there for me at my lowest point with a genuine concern not only for my situation, but for me and my child's well being above all… He is fair and he is strong and when push comes to shove he is there for you. Cathy Dodge
★★★★★
Our cousin used Peter's law office to help with a sticky custody situation. He was extremely responsive, very nice and most importantly did an awesome job with the court! He is awesome. Lawrence Polsky

*Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances